
Women Voters Make the Difference in Key Races
November 8, 2000
If only men had voted:
George Bush would have tied up Florida 53 to 43% for an electoral college victory; instead, women’s 54 to 44% vote in the state kept Gore’s hopes for Florida’s 25 electoral votes alive;
Bush would have had a clear victory in the country’s popular vote, 53 to 42; because women voted 54 to 42% for Gore, he stunned the pundits by winning the popular vote;
Bill Nelson, who won the votes of women 57 to 40% in his race for the U.S. Senate seat from Florida, would have seen his victory dashed 52 to 46%;
Jeanne Carnahan would not be coming to the U.S. Senate won by her husband, who would have lost 52-47%; women voters gave her the edge 53 to 46%;
Debbie Stabenow would have lost to incumbent Senator Spence Abraham in Michigan 45 to 53%; women voters’ 55 to 42% support for Stabenow defeated Abraham and conventional wisdom on the invincibility of incumbents;
Gov. Howard Dean, who won women’s vote 56 to 33%, would have found himself in a 44 to 44% deadlock after being targeted by conservatives for signing the Vermont civil unions act into law; and
Gov. Jeanne Shaheen would have lost her re-election bid in New Hampshire by 42 to 50%; women’s strong 56 to 38% support put Shaheen over the top.
If only white men had voted:
Senator-elect Hillary Rodham Clinton, who won 61 to 50% among women voters, 91 to 9% among Blacks and 85 to 15% among Hispanics, would have lost to Rick Lazio 56 to 42%; and
Governor-elect Ruth Minner in Delaware would have been defeated by 55 to 44% rather than winning with 69% of women and 87% of African Americans.