08
12

Discrimination Against Mothers Is Discrimination Against Women

by Erin Matson, NOW Action Vice President

As a young woman who has battled it out in workplaces that in no way resemble the National NOW Action Center, I believe strongly that discrimination against mothers in the workplace results in discrimination against all women in the workplace. It seems that because it's illegal for an employer to ask a woman whether she wishes to have a family, instead many employers assume that a woman will have a family and dock her pay and promotion accordingly. I have watched it happen to my friends. I have wondered if it has affected me. This isn't an academic exercise. It can be pretty revolting to learn what men in your workplace are getting paid and then look at your own paycheck.

It's a paradox that does not make sense: There is a widely held assumption that women will pour their energies into caregiving rather than the marketplace (which seems to imply an acknowledgement that caregiving takes energy and time), and yet this country has some of the most unfriendly leave policies in the world. Here in the U.S. the Family and Medical Leave Act only covers women who work for employers of 50 or more (which doesn't cover most of us), and it gives us only twelve weeks of unpaid leave, whereas most industrialized nations provide about three months of paid leave. It's as if the public and private sector here endorses Senator Lindsey Graham's unconscionable concept of "dropping a baby," equating childbearing with a casual, willful intent to secure benefits.

Our entire society would fall apart without the unpaid, unrecognized caregiving work performed primarily by women. It could be argued that the women who do so are "serving their country" on an equal level as those who serve in the military, and I do argue that. Without unpaid caregivers, there is no future workforce, and there is an expanded need for social support. So why no paid leave? And why so much pay discrimination against women? And why no standard and quality early childhood education available in all neighborhoods? And why no Social Security benefits for time spent caregiving?

6 comments » Register or log in to leave a comment. [Log in] [Register...]

Comment from: letsbefair [Member] Email
Aren't 12 weeks and 3 months nearly equivalent?
08/14/10 @ 20:19
Report Abuse

Comment from: Erin Matson, NOW Action Vice President [Member] Email
I believe most families do not consider 12 weeks of unpaid leave nearly equivalent to three months of paid leave.
08/17/10 @ 10:44
Report Abuse

Comment from: letsbefair [Member] Email
I know paid and unpaid makes a significant difference, but 12 weeks and 3 months are nearly equivalent, are they not?
08/18/10 @ 15:39
Report Abuse

Comment from: goodcitizen [Member] Email
Social Security is not an entitlement. We receive S.S. because we contributed to it thru our paychecks. I suppose it would be a good idea to allow people to contribute to S.S. even when, and while they don't receive financial compensation. I think the authors intended comparison was "paid Vs. unpaid, not 12 weeks, or 3 months, which are indeed identical time periods.
08/19/10 @ 12:15
Report Abuse

Comment from: letsbefair [Member] Email
Then I merely think the author should have identified them as identical periods. That's all. I agree with the basic thesis of the piece - paid parental leave should be granted to both parents, and parents who take care of children are indeed doing a service to their country, their children, and themselves. Have a good day.
08/24/10 @ 02:54
Report Abuse

Comment from: karen kelley [Member] Email
Women who leave the workforce to raise children for a few years run a great risk, unless they have the required quarters to qualify for SSDI (Disability Insurance). Most young women do not have the quarters required. If a woman in this country gets a chronic illness, like MS, and they do not have recent quarters of work, then their family has no protection against unreasonable and unimaginable healthcare costs, which should be paid for through Medicare. A seriously ill woman who is married is disquallified from getting Medicaid because her husbands income is counted against her, even if all of that income is being used up in medical bills. Often, women are abandoned by their spouses or have to get divorced to avoid bankrupting the family. I have seen 40 year old women forced to live in Nursing Homes because they have no alternatives. Please someone tell me that you are addressing this HUGE problem of inequality in awarding SSDI and SSI, There has to be an answer,
09/01/10 @ 23:23
Report Abuse

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.