02
20

So A White Guy Flies Into A Federal Building ...

by Erin Matson, NOW Action Vice President

Joseph Stack flew a plane into an IRS office in Austin, Texas. On purpose. That's terrorism. Calling it anything else, because he was white, is racism.

Earlier today, Nihad Awad, the national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said: "The position of many individuals and institutions seems to be that no act of violence can be labeled 'terrorism' unless it is carried out by a Muslim."

The hypocrisy smacks clear in the U.S. definition of terrorism, which is "premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents."

That's Joseph Stack's suicide bombing. He used a plane, people.

Even the radical right, as embodied by today's Tea Party movement (95 percent white, give or take three percentage points, according to a very recent poll), isn't calling this fella a terrorist. Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), the pride and joy of those socialism-fearing people, went so far as to use this opportunity to say:

"Certainly, no one likes paying taxes, obviously."

Beyond Mr. Awad, few public figures have labeled this attack terrorism. The media certainly hasn't. The White House is reserving judgment until an investigation of the crash is completed (imagine if a previous administration had applied that logic to 9/11!). A lonely few, including Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas), have gone so far as to call it "domestic terrorism."

I have long bristled at the term domestic terrorism, and for a few reasons. Terrorism is terrorism. It seems unnecessary to offer an implicit reminder of those "foreigners you should fear" every time a homegrown militant starts bombing and assassinating. Certainly the news media doesn't use "foreign terrorism" to remind everyone that abortion clinics get firebombed by white men.

In fact, the terrorism/domestic terrorism dichotomy seems to be used only to make clear on what side of the violence you'll find the less-privileged. (Even the Oklahoma City bomber affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan before attacking the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building.)

Beyond the blatant racism in refusing to call the Austin attack terrorism, I remain deeply uneasy. The evening of the attack, I drove past a house with one candle lit in each window. We can only hope this observation is as anecdotal and off-target as Senator Brown's.

6 comments » Register or log in to leave a comment. [Log in] [Register...]

Comment from: erica [Member] Email
I'm sick of politicians using inaccurate language when referring to important issues. Stack is a terrorist. GW Bush is a war criminal. People against abortion are antichoice. Politicians should use appropriate language.
02/21/10 @ 01:46
Report Abuse

Comment from: amyslutkin [Member] Email
It is curious that Ms. Matson, while speaking in generalities, singles out the Tea Party for not calling Stack a terrorist. As evidenced by his screed left on embeddedart.com, Stack was, among other things, a communist-leaning, Catholic hater who despised George Bush and Ronald Reagan. Why on earth does Ms. Matson expect the Tea Party to speak for this "fella?" Could Ms. Matson's rant be a thinnly-veiled attempt to associate Stack with the Tea Party Movement? Many in the media, including Hilary Hylton from TIME and Jonathan Capehart of the Washington Post, have tried to make this association.

Furthermore, where are Ms. Matson's calls for Dr. Amy Bishop, a white woman who actually murdered three people, to be called a terrorist? If one follows Ms. Matson's logic, "[c]alling it anything anything else, because [she is a woman and] white is [sexism and] racism.
02/21/10 @ 16:28
Report Abuse

Comment from: jwilson23 [Member] Email
I agree that people should use appropriate language, the problem seems to be people use a combination of language, circumstance, crisis and other 'news' to further an agenda. For instance why the insistence on labeling Stack a terrorist? Why such an emphasis on a label for this criminal? Is there another goal or aim to be pushed, influenced or managed by adopting the label of terrorist for Stack? And while on the subject of labels, what is the issue with the term 'domestic terrorist'? Doesn't it simply differentiate between US and foreign national terrorists? Why is that an issue as well? Could it have to do with an agenda regarding the appropriate venue for trial?
02/21/10 @ 21:17
Report Abuse

Comment from: ronaldreagan [Member] Email
Erin Matson, are you so blinded by your ideolgy or just dumb. The guy is a wacko AHOLE., Muslims are doing their Jihad in the name of Islam, nice try Nihad Awad. Ibrahim Hooper is part of your front phony group that are terrorists. So a dopey lesbian supporting someone who hates gays... You know why there are so many white people at tea party rally's? The minorities in this country are given cradle to grave beneifts from the dopey left in return for their votes. Look at all the minorities working in government... Who pays their salaries and benefits. Governement workers create no value. It's the private sector who generates money for the government.NOW is a joke and so are you.
02/25/10 @ 17:16
Report Abuse

Comment from: feminism=sexism [Member] Email
Joe stack was even in the plane many witnesses reported no one inside the aircraft. Emergency crews were at the building before the crash. Inside job folks. Feminism was created to get women to try and compete with men and throw off the harmonic resonance created by loving relationships and family environments. WAKE UP go to
INFOWARS.com and read the real news.
03/05/10 @ 17:04
Report Abuse

Comment from: feminism=sexism [Member] Email
Joe stack wasn't in the plane. How do you know if he was or wasn't? Witnesses say no. I wasn't there I'll take their perspective over the mainstream media.
03/05/10 @ 17:20
Report Abuse

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.