01
28

Women Working U.S. out of the Recession

by Jami Laubich, Communications Intern

On Jan. 21, Women's Policy Inc. held a briefing about the impact of women on the recession. Speaker Rebecca M. Blank, the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs in the U.S. Department of Justice, explained that the United States has been in the worst recession since World War II, and that future generations may refer to this time as a depression.

Women are responsible for helping get us out of this recession. A recent PEW study suggests that 22 percent of heterosexual married couples have wives earning more then their husbands. Women are now more likely than ever before to be the bread winner and contribute a higher share of income to their families. It should be no surprise then that women now constitute almost 50 percent of all workers.

Women have been more likely to stay employed during the recession then men. According to current population surveys, jobs more often held by men in construction and manufacturing have decreased by 39 percent since 2007. Meanwhile, jobs in health services where women are employed at a higher rate have actually increased by 4.5 percent.

Recessions impact more then just family pocketbooks. Income correlates with power in household and effects decision making. As Blank pointed out, domestic abuse is not a low-income issue. However, domestic abuse is higher during a recession, especially when men are unemployed. Choices surrounding family are highly affected during depressions, for example fertility often decreases as families choose not to have children based on financial concerns. Marriage and divorce both cost money, and therefore decrease during economic lulls while cohabitation rates go up. Multi-generational homes become more common as unemployed college graduates move back home.

At the briefing Blank said the stimulus package, which was greatly influenced by groups like NOW, has had very noticeable effects on the labor market. If it weren't for the efforts of NOW and other women's rights advocates, billions of dollars would have gone primarily into "shovel ready" projects, meaning financial support would have been funneled to construction jobs where women only make up less than 15 percent of the industry. NOW's goal in helping shape the stimulus package was to encourage investment in efforts and projects that would put women back to work and jump-start the economy. Through the stimulus package, U.S. families will continue to be positively effected thanks to NOW's lobbying efforts. Blank explained that the stimulus package had expanded food stamps and increased assistance with health care extensions for the unemployed. With a nod to the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and a quick remark about health care being a woman's issue, Blank culminated her speech by claiming she was cautiously optimistic about the future. But positive results depend on the continued advocacy of feminists like you and me.

2 comments » Register or log in to leave a comment. [Log in] [Register...]

Comment from: cabaret voltaire [Member] Email
I can't help but think NOW would be furious if the gender employment statistics were reversed. It seems NOW's only concern with male unemployment is domestic abuse --- which as we all know is based on unreliable statistics. And as usual, NOW ignores any abuse perpetuated by women,.

Feminist advocacy and lobbing against increased funding for 'shovel' ready jobs has exacerbated the male unemployment situation. How you think that's beneficial for families I'll never know. Because women make up only 15% of the construction means the industry should lose funding?????

Female dominated professions were not being effected by the recession. I guess feminists get some perverse satisfaction about men losing jobs but the other 99.99999% of women who aren't feminists would like to see the male unemployment drop. It almost seems this blog is nothing more then gloating and proof positive NOW is not about equality, but class warfare. Typical 'us vs them' ideology.

NOW's input in the stimulus package was a disaster because it ignored half the population. For future reference, stay away from economics.
01/30/10 @ 09:59
Report Abuse

Comment from: kay [Member] Email
speaking about Unemployment--I was hired at a factory, told I would be doing one job during orentation, and on my first day I was given a job I was physically not strong enough to do. I asked to be put on my original job and the male supervisors refused. I had no choice but to quit the job, or risk hurting mysef permanently--I filed for unemployment as I had been working all year, and previous to this job, lost another job. The factory contested my unemployment and the State of IN found in their favor saying "being physically not able to do a job IS NOT a valid reason for quiting!! A male judge decided this. So I have no income and will become homeless next month due to the fact that a male judge can dictate his absurd ruling on me. This state is out of touch with reality.
02/08/10 @ 19:24
Report Abuse

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.