01
28

Interns Stand Up to Angry Anti-Abortion Crowd at Supreme Court

by Riley Karbon, Field Intern

Friday, Jan. 22, marked the 37th anniversary of Roe v. Wade bringing thousands of anti-choice people to march down Constitution Avenue ending at the Supreme Court. Myself and three other NOW interns were there rallying for abortion rights and celebrating the Roe decision recognizing women's right to abortion. We decided early on not to speak to nor make eye contact with any anti-choice marchers.

So without any verbal provocation, what were we met with? Anger and insults. It's hard to imagine how the majority of marchers, Catholic school kids who were given the day off from school and bussed in to march, came to be so angry. What sort of false anti-abortion propaganda were they shown on the bus on their way here?

This youthful anger was quite apparent once the heart of the march reached us at the Supreme Court. Two other interns and I were separated from the small but mighty pro-choice crowd and quickly surrounded by high school students. For an hour, they screamed insults at us, grabbed signs out of our hands, and shoved their signs in our faces. The insults were directed at our gender and age, calling us "sluts" and "whores," speculating how many abortions we might have had and if we were pregnant at the moment.

Some protestors told us it was fruitless to chant about the separation of church and state because they were already separate, yet one young man shoved a dollar bill in our faces, goading us to read "In God We Trust" and admit the union. Insulting remarks about the size of our group did not discourage us, as I believe we rallied for the majority of the nation. Jami, Jess and I stood our ground, did not engage, did not even look them in the eye for a second while we chanted and sang "Lean on Me."

What's disheartening is that these kids were bussed in to go on a "voluntary" trip to take a stand on an issue that will most likely personally affect them or someone they know at some point in their lives. I wondered how many of the views they angrily spouted were formulated on their own. Misinformation flowed from the schools to the Supreme Court steps, as stories about babies being thrown in dumpsters and down garbage disposals were shouted into a microphone.

It's enough to make you angry. Angry that some people want to put fetal rights above women's rights. Angry that they are lying to the next generation. Angry that their voices are being heard because they scream the loudest. If you're angry, then do something! Join NOW and get involved with your local chapter. And make sure you're at the next reproductive rights demonstration so that our numbers reflect the pro-choice majority.

12 comments » Register or log in to leave a comment. [Log in] [Register...]

Comment from: underwear25 [Member] Email
"Angry that some people want to put fetal rights above women's rights" Shouldn't they have equal rights? I mean, what makes them less human than women? (I'm not arguing with you, I just want some clarification...)
01/29/10 @ 11:03
Report Abuse

Comment from: daniellemharms [Member] Email
Nice entry Riley, and you have all my respect for maintaining your calm and dignity. Keep up the good work!
01/29/10 @ 22:04
Report Abuse

Comment from: mary [Member] Email
Why doesn't NOW support pro choice, pro 'the morning after pill'. It seems promoting abortion, is supporting a medevial procedure. How much better for a woman to take a pill the morning after 'unplanned' sex, than schedule an abortion? I think it makes NOW look like it's so out of touch with the current environment. College girls are having multiple abortions, using it as a means of birth control. Promoting 'the morning after pill' would bring NOW into the current century and support an option less harmful for women than an abortion.
01/30/10 @ 09:16
Report Abuse

Comment from: mary [Member] Email
Someone, please respond on my comment? I'd like to see NOW be more responsible and be pro 'morning after pill' rather than pro abortion. It seems the most 'healthy' option, and it seems NOW is promoting an option that has more potential to harm a women's health.
01/30/10 @ 10:59
Report Abuse

Comment from: cabaret voltaire [Member] Email · http://www.politicalcowardice.com/
I'm pro choice. I think every woman has the right to kill a fetus. And make no mistake about it -- a fetus is a living organism. I wonder if a fetus feels pain during an abortion procedure?

"The only reason why any of us are alive is because someone decided to let us live" (Nicole Blackman)


01/30/10 @ 11:49
Report Abuse

Comment from: jen olsson [Member] Email
Dear Ms. Riley,
The Catholic kids you are wondering about at the rally you attended are just as receptive to suggestion as kids who have parents teaching them that killing babies in the womb is ok. I have a dream that one day, when there are abortion clinics as common as StarBucks, that no one uses them because women finally feel loved enough, and love themselves enough to keep their children safe...in the womb. Abortion is a lie that woman have been made to believe is safe and health giving and good. Not one of the women in my family is grateful for her abortion. They all regret that they were pressured by the world around them to feel guilty about being pregnant. Abortion is harmful to women, children, it is prejudice against the unborn, it is a political form of genocide. I will pray for you and for all women, and children born, unborn, and to be born. Peace be with you.
01/31/10 @ 10:53
Report Abuse

Comment from: mary [Member] Email
jen...hopefully, NOW comes into the current century, and supports the morning after pill as a choice rather than the riskier procedure of abortion. I thought Nancy Pelosi and women in Congress were must too old to know there's a morning after pill....but it looks like NOW is also uniformed about the safer options for women.
01/31/10 @ 11:28
Report Abuse

Comment from: jen olsson [Member] Email
How can an organization that doesn't believe in choice offer a choice?
02/01/10 @ 07:26
Report Abuse

Comment from: jrm83 [Member] Email
That's an interesting question, Jen. How do organizations like Focus on the Family, Eagle Forum, or Family Research Council offer a choice when they don't believe in choice?

Mary, NOW does support the morning after pill and is trying to make it more available since it is still not carried in all pharmacies or even supplied in all emergency rooms for rape victims. However, it is only effective if taken within the first 72 hours which can become problematic for women who have trouble accessing it (either because it is not available at local pharmacies or hospitals or because doctors/pharmacists are morally opposed to dispensing the medication), and is not as effective as regular birth control. While greater access to the morning after pill and other forms of contraception will help reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies, it will not eliminate them completely.

Like it or not, some women will always have abortions--even if abortion is outlawed. Some because of an unplanned pregnancy, others because of health reasons or fatal fetal deformities. For this reason, I (and many other pro-choice individuals) support a woman's right to choose. That choice can mean abortion, adoption, or motherhood; but it's her choice and no one has the right to try to force her to do anything she doesn't want to do.
02/04/10 @ 17:06
Report Abuse

Comment from: mary [Member] Email
Totally agree, choice can mean any of those options...but, what concerns me is I hear NOTHING about the safer method of the 'morning after pill' from the women's organizations. All I hear about is abortion. Even if there's always going to be a need for abortion, it should be pushed as an ancient procedure and the new push, I believe, should be the 'morning after pill'. Bring us into this century.
02/07/10 @ 10:45
Report Abuse

Comment from: jen olsson [Member] Email
RE: jrm83,
At least Focus on the Family knows what they are about and they do not pretend to work both sides of the street like NOW.
02/09/10 @ 13:15
Report Abuse

Comment from: erica [Member] Email
I understand the anger felt by Riley. I'm glad that, despite the outrage I'm sure she feels towards the antichoice movement, she did not lower herself to their standards. It's heartbreaking when I go to animal welfare demos and people say things out of hate and/or ignorance, so I can definitely relate, Riley. Keep on being calm and level-headed, and prove that we're not going to stoop to their level.
02/15/10 @ 12:41
Report Abuse

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.