09
24

Surrogate Motherhood: A Feminist Issue?

by Liza Doubossarskaia, NOW Communications Intern

Recently, a practice that is illegal throughout most of the world has become quite popular in the United States. That practice is surrogacy -- a contractual process by which a woman agrees to carry a pregnancy to term and deliver a child to parents who are unable to conceive by traditional means. Some view surrogacy as a beneficial scientific development, while others see it as an affront to ethical standards.

Little legislation exists pertaining to the legality of surrogate parenting in the United Sates, which allows the practice to exist as a viable business. According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, there was a 30 percent rise in surrogate births between 2004 and 2006. Hopeful parents can hire a surrogate through one of the numerous agencies dedicated to matching surrogate mothers with intended parents. A usual fee for surrogate services is around $20,000 -- excluding medical expenses.

However, while a number of women find monetary compensation to be an attractive incentive, most insist that their primary motivation for offering surrogate services is altruistic. One surrogate explained to Newsweek magazine that she found surrogacy to be a meaningful and fulfilling experience because she was able to gift another family with a child. Another surrogate, in her interview with Newsweek, stated, "I felt like, 'What else am I going to do with my life that means so much?'" Moreover, many surrogate mothers find the claim that they're in the business only for money objectionable. After all, if you break down the $20,000 tag, it turns out that a surrogate mother is paid about $3 an hour to carry a full-term pregnancy -- a low salary even by minimum wage standards.

If surrogates are happy with their job and childless parents are given a chance to have biological offspring, what's the big fuss?

For starters, critics of surrogacy raise concerns that the practice endorses class inequality and exploitation of poor women. Most of the time, the intended parents come from affluent backgrounds, while surrogate mothers are women of modest income. Then, there are the ethical and legal questions to consider. Does surrogacy devalue the mother-child relationship? What happens if a surrogate mother is unwilling to part with the child after birth? Is it acceptable for a woman to rent out her body even if it is to help someone less fortunate? Various complications can develop during pregnancy and childbirth, making this a potentially risky proposition for the life, health and future childbearing ability of any woman who serves as a surrogate. Not to mention the artificial insemination procedure, which is often part of the process and comes with its own set of possible health repercussions.

Finally, due to its unregulated nature, the surrogacy business is ripe for fraud and deceit. Take for instance the case of SurroGenesis -- a surrogate company that vanished and pocketed the money intended to cover surrogates' health insurance. SurroGenesis' clients were left stranded with a pile of medical bills and nowhere to turn

Should surrogacy be viewed as a legitimate branch of assisted reproductive technology and receive more governmental regulation to protect intended parents and surrogates? Is surrogacy an exploitation of women's bodies that should be stopped? Tell us what you think.

7 comments » Register or log in to leave a comment. [Log in] [Register...]

Comment from: kathy.sloan [Member] Email
As a life-long feminist now conducting research on surrogacy for a project on women and biotechnology, it is my personal opinion that surrogacy should be banned as it preys upon mostly poor young women who sell their bodies for an average of $3.00 per hour. It is the ultimate in capitalist exploitation, commodifying women's bodies (as prostitution and the pornography industry do) wherein the wealthy take advantage the poor.

People who want to have children who are physically unable to should consider giving their love, resources and attention to one of the innumerable children without homes or families through adoption.

Minimally, federal regulation of this growing business is essential to stop fraud and deceit by surrogacy companies which victimizes both surrogates and the people who rent their bodies.
09/28/09 @ 14:06
Report Abuse

Comment from: courtneyhenslee [Member] Email · http://thewaysheseesitintexas.wordpress.com
As a healthy woman living below the poverty line with three children to care for and an ex who refuses to have more than a minimum wage job so he can pay the lowest possible amount of child support (while he sells drugs so that the judge can't garnish that income)... I have often considered being a surrogate.

I am also a life-long feminist and produced and hosted a popular feminist mothering radio show in Houston. I have been in poverty for a long time, but am also educated and choose poverty over leaving my children in hours of aftercare after school. Surrogacy seemed like a good choice to be able to do whatever I wanted to for a while and still be making money.

Then I saw how little it pays. As a mother, I know the kind of irreparable changes our bodies go through during pregnancy. This does not include the emotions, discomfort, and innate worry that take over our lives at this time.

$3 an hour was not enough for me. But I wondered who it was enough for and realized that these women have no idea that they are getting a real short end of a very long stick. I am not against surrogacy, but the price has GOT to be right. Until science has some magical womb and babies can stay in a lab for 9 months (which I am NOT saying I advocate at all), women have got to understand that our bodies are completely magical places. If someone wants to use that magic, we deserve to be compensated extremely well.

I think that there should be some minimal price legislation that is put into place under the auspice of protecting women who simply do not understand the gravity or importance of what they are doing. There will always be some poor girl or woman willing to take a pittance and legislation seems like the only way to attempt to protect them.
09/29/09 @ 09:35
Report Abuse

Comment from: Shannon Drury [Member] · http://www.shannondrury.blogspot.com
I agree with the comments above--we cannot outlaw surrogacy any more than we can outlaw sex work. What we as feminists need to do is dismantle the systems that make selling their bodies & body parts a sound financial option for low income women.
09/29/09 @ 15:14
Report Abuse

Comment from: andthentheresmaude36 [Member] Email
One of the reasons Surrogacy is not regulated in our country is because at its core is the abortion issue - who owns the embryo, who has control over the embryo, who gets to inherit the embryo, and in order to answer those questions you have to define what the embryo is, and once you define the embryo legally you are in the middle of the abortion debate which no politician wants to touch.
Personally, if you want to do that and have the emotional fortitude to do that fine but the family who takes the child should have to be responsible for all expenses and ins of the family should pay for all expenses. It is a slippery slope though as mostly wealthy people can afford it.
09/30/09 @ 17:32
Report Abuse

Comment from: andthentheresmaude36 [Member] Email
Also this is an example of a surrogacy gone wrong at every turn. yikes.
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/538/index.html
09/30/09 @ 17:34
Report Abuse

Comment from: thebitchinthehouse [Member] Email
The core principal of feminism is choice. Whether you choose to reserve your body for your own children or use it as a tool to help someone in need, it is ultimately your decision. I do believe that lower-class women can find something like surrogacy appealing even though it does not offer great financial perks (when you're poor enough, you'll take what you can get), but no-one is forcing such women to take such an option. For a woman to choose surrogacy for financial reasons is not only pointless (you'd make more cash at McDonald's), but it speaks volumes about her character: using a service designed to help desperate people is only a true show of humanitarianism when the volunteer is actually focused on the well-being of those receiving the service. In cases where selfishness is a motive, I have no pity for the women who 'donate' their bodies. Really, considering that the nature of surrogacy is to aid the biologically unfortunate, there should not be any monetary compensation; the idea of charity is to consider the gains of others, not oneself. I do, however, believe that women who volunteer for surrogacy should receive the best health care possible for mother and child, in an effort to achieve positive results. Counseling should also be encouraged, not only to assist with the ever-common emotional roller coaster associated with pregnancy, but to give the surrogate the comfort that she will undoubtedly need after separating from the baby and in the case that things do not turn out as planned (i.e. miscarriage, etc.).
We as women have been fighting long and hard for the right to choose. We must also fight to make this world a comfortable place in which to make those choices.
10/13/09 @ 15:37
Report Abuse

Comment from: emma quigley [Member] Email
I recently learned that my niece is a surrogate for a couple unable to have child on their own. When I found out I was filled with awe and admiration for her selfless act. She is willing to bear a child within her body for nine months with all that that entails - hormonal changes, discomfort, labor, surgery, recovery, etc. She is even at risk of having to have an hysterectomy when all is said and done due to the placenta attaching to her uterus. And she's okay with all that..... In my eyes, she is my hero. She is sensitive to the many friends of hers who have had difficulty conceiving. She has felt fortunate that she's been blessed with three children and uncomplicated pregnancies. Whatever compensation she has received is not enough - her act is priceless. Twenty years ago, we adopted two children. It never entered into our mind to seek a surrogate. No matter what anyone thinks, if they have ever tried to conceive and lost a child, or gone through the clinical tests, insemination, in vitro, hormonal therapies, etc. I cannot imagine that anyone could think of surrogacy as anything but a generous act if done for the right reasons as I believe my niece is doing. You see, our perception of events such as this really comes down to where we're coming from as to whether something is right or not.
12/13/09 @ 17:22
Report Abuse

Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.