Surrogate Motherhood: A Feminist Issue?
Recently, a practice that is illegal throughout most of the world has become quite popular in the United States. That practice is surrogacy -- a contractual process by which a woman agrees to carry a pregnancy to term and deliver a child to parents who are unable to conceive by traditional means. Some view surrogacy as a beneficial scientific development, while others see it as an affront to ethical standards.
Little legislation exists pertaining to the legality of surrogate parenting in the United Sates, which allows the practice to exist as a viable business. According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, there was a 30 percent rise in surrogate births between 2004 and 2006. Hopeful parents can hire a surrogate through one of the numerous agencies dedicated to matching surrogate mothers with intended parents. A usual fee for surrogate services is around $20,000 -- excluding medical expenses.
However, while a number of women find monetary compensation to be an attractive incentive, most insist that their primary motivation for offering surrogate services is altruistic. One surrogate explained to Newsweek magazine that she found surrogacy to be a meaningful and fulfilling experience because she was able to gift another family with a child. Another surrogate, in her interview with Newsweek, stated, "I felt like, 'What else am I going to do with my life that means so much?'" Moreover, many surrogate mothers find the claim that they're in the business only for money objectionable. After all, if you break down the $20,000 tag, it turns out that a surrogate mother is paid about $3 an hour to carry a full-term pregnancy -- a low salary even by minimum wage standards.
If surrogates are happy with their job and childless parents are given a chance to have biological offspring, what's the big fuss?
For starters, critics of surrogacy raise concerns that the practice endorses class inequality and exploitation of poor women. Most of the time, the intended parents come from affluent backgrounds, while surrogate mothers are women of modest income. Then, there are the ethical and legal questions to consider. Does surrogacy devalue the mother-child relationship? What happens if a surrogate mother is unwilling to part with the child after birth? Is it acceptable for a woman to rent out her body even if it is to help someone less fortunate? Various complications can develop during pregnancy and childbirth, making this a potentially risky proposition for the life, health and future childbearing ability of any woman who serves as a surrogate. Not to mention the artificial insemination procedure, which is often part of the process and comes with its own set of possible health repercussions.
Finally, due to its unregulated nature, the surrogacy business is ripe for fraud and deceit. Take for instance the case of SurroGenesis -- a surrogate company that vanished and pocketed the money intended to cover surrogates' health insurance. SurroGenesis' clients were left stranded with a pile of medical bills and nowhere to turn
Should surrogacy be viewed as a legitimate branch of assisted reproductive technology and receive more governmental regulation to protect intended parents and surrogates? Is surrogacy an exploitation of women's bodies that should be stopped? Tell us what you think.

People who want to have children who are physically unable to should consider giving their love, resources and attention to one of the innumerable children without homes or families through adoption.
Minimally, federal regulation of this growing business is essential to stop fraud and deceit by surrogacy companies which victimizes both surrogates and the people who rent their bodies.
I am also a life-long feminist and produced and hosted a popular feminist mothering radio show in Houston. I have been in poverty for a long time, but am also educated and choose poverty over leaving my children in hours of aftercare after school. Surrogacy seemed like a good choice to be able to do whatever I wanted to for a while and still be making money.
Then I saw how little it pays. As a mother, I know the kind of irreparable changes our bodies go through during pregnancy. This does not include the emotions, discomfort, and innate worry that take over our lives at this time.
$3 an hour was not enough for me. But I wondered who it was enough for and realized that these women have no idea that they are getting a real short end of a very long stick. I am not against surrogacy, but the price has GOT to be right. Until science has some magical womb and babies can stay in a lab for 9 months (which I am NOT saying I advocate at all), women have got to understand that our bodies are completely magical places. If someone wants to use that magic, we deserve to be compensated extremely well.
I think that there should be some minimal price legislation that is put into place under the auspice of protecting women who simply do not understand the gravity or importance of what they are doing. There will always be some poor girl or woman willing to take a pittance and legislation seems like the only way to attempt to protect them.
Personally, if you want to do that and have the emotional fortitude to do that fine but the family who takes the child should have to be responsible for all expenses and ins of the family should pay for all expenses. It is a slippery slope though as mostly wealthy people can afford it.
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/538/index.html
We as women have been fighting long and hard for the right to choose. We must also fight to make this world a comfortable place in which to make those choices.
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.