LEGISLATIVE
UPDATE
|
| Bankruptcy Changes Threaten Child Support | Large banking companies that issue credit cards are attempting to push
through Congress legislation that could negatively impact divorced women
who are owed alimony or child support. The companies want to make access
to bankruptcy harder and to change payment priorities for non-dischargeable
debt. This would include not only child support, alimony, taxes and student
loans --currently, debts that cannot be erased -- but, as proposed, any
credit card charges made 90 days prior to a person's filing for bankruptcy.
Women and children would then be in competition with big banks for a limited
pool of dollars.
Further analysis shows that changes would result in many divorced women with children waiting five years or more to receive all of their past due child support. Additionally, the changes could prevent an ex-wife from getting relief from liability for some of her husband's credit card debt and may also result in the loss of the family home (under Chapter 13 bankruptcy requirements). If these radical changes are made to bankruptcy law, NOW and many women's organizations fear that child support obligations will not be paid or that they will be paid late -- placing many single-headed households at risk. Others who could be seriously disadvantaged by the legislation are: women who file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the wake of divorce to stabilize a shaky financial situation, older persons who have been thrown out of work or had their income severely impacted by major illness and others whose incomes have been affected by companies down-sizing or relocating. News reports indicate that tens of millions of dollars have been spent by the banking industry to promote the legislation and that key Congressional leaders have received hundreds of thousands of dollars for their re-election campaigns. Their hope, apparently, was to quietly move it through a friendly Congress, while the public attention was diverted by Special Prosecutor Ken Starr's second indictment of Webster Hubbell, the refusal of immunity for Monica Lewinsky and other distractions. The House Judiciary Committee
has set a mark-up session on Tuesday, May 12th, for H.R.
3150, the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998, sponsored by Rep. George
Gekas (R-PA) and 39 other members. Its Senate counterpart, S.
1301, the Consumer Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998, sponsored by
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) will undergo a
mark-up session possibly as early as May 14th. A hearing had been set for
the Senate, but when serious criticism began to surface, the committee
leadership decided to go directly to final mark-up in an effort to rush
through the legislation.
In promoting this legislation, credit card issuers have portrayed credit card debtors as irresponsible abusers of the system -- running up huge debts that they fully intend to walk away from after filing for bankruptcy. Elizabeth Warren, professor of bankruptcy law at Harvard University and her colleagues, interviewed thousands of bankruptcy filers in 16 judicial districts to find that this is not often the case. The vast majority of persons who file for bankruptcy are conscientious individuals who try to keep up with monthly payments but become overwhelmed when a personal calamity occurs -- such as divorce, illness, job loss, death of a spouse or some other major life event. Prof. Warren indicates that during 1997, an estimated 243,000 to 325,000
bankruptcy cases involved child support and alimony orders. In about half
of the cases studied, women were creditors trying to collect child support
and alimony from their bankrupt ex-partners.
|
ACTION NEEDED |
Please call, fax or e-mail members of the House
Judiciary Committee as soon as possible (final mark-up is May 12th).
Let them know that this bill should not be passed and that any drastic
change of bankruptcy laws must be well considered. More public hearings
and evaluation of the impacts on divorced women raising children, older
and low income persons need to be made. Democratic members of the House
Judiciary Committee include: John Conyers, Jr. (MI), Barney Frank (MA),
Charles Schumer (NY), Howard Berman (CA), Rick Boucher (VA), Jerrold Nadler
(NY), Bobby Scott (VA), Melvin Watt (NC), Zoe Lofgren (CA), Sheila Jackson
Lee (TX), Maxine Waters (CA), Marty Meehan (MA), William Delahunt (MA),
Robert Wexler (FL) and Steven Rothman (NJ). Activists should call also
Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL), chair of the committee, to ask for more hearings.
All 18 Republican members were expected to support H.R. 3150.
A better opportunity for making NOW activists' views known on the proposed bankruptcy changes may lie with the Senate Judiciary Committee which will be finalizing S. 1301 at any time beginning May 14th. The Committee line-up includes Republicans: Chair Orrin Hatch (UT), Strom Thurmond (SC), Charles E. Grassley (IA), Arlen Specter (PA), Fred Thompson (TN), Jon L. Kyl (AZ), Mike DeWine (OH), John Ashcroft (MO), Spencer Abraham (MI) and Jeff Sessions (AL). Democratics include Ranking Member Patrick J. Leahy (VT), Edward M. Kennedy (MA), Joseph R. Biden, Jr. (DE), Herbert H. Kohl (WI), Richard J. Durbin (IL), and Robert Torricelli (NJ). But, whether your Senator is on the Judiciary Committee or not, you should make your views known. Call the main number at the Capitol 202-224-3121 and the operator will connect you with your Senators' or Representative's offices. |
| Victory! Affirmative Action in Higher Education Preserved | An amendment to the Higher
Education Act to ban affirmative action programs in higher education
went down to defeat in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, May 6th,
by a vote of 249-171. Fifty-five Republicans joined Democrats to kill the
measure, offered by Rep. Frank Riggs (R-CA), which would have prohibited
colleges and universities in their admissions programs from establishing
equal opportunity policies for women and people of color to redress gender,
racial and ethnic discrimination.
Republican Rep. J.C. Watts (R-OK), an African American, differed with the party's leadership on this amendment and voted for its defeat. Rep. Watts joined with Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) in writing colleagues in the House that "this is not the time to eliminate the one tool we have -- imperfect though it may be -- to help level the playing field for many minority youth." |
ACTION NEEDED |
Thanks for all your help in beating back this terrible amendment. That makes three wins (adding the two victories preserving the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program for in the federal transportation bill, ISTEA). Activists, though, will need to begin gearing up for a number of anti-affirmative action ballot measures pending in various states; more information about those battles will appear in the next Update. |
| Military Access to Abortion Amendment Fails Again | An action that has become a recurring event is the defeat of Rep. Jane Harman's (D-CA) amendment to repeal an odious provision of current law that prohibits military personnel and dependents from obtaining abortions at military hospitals overseas. The limitation even applies to women obtaining services using their own funds -- something that would be constitutionally protected in the U.S. The amendment failed by a vote of 20 -28 in the House National Security Committee during mark-up of the FY 99 National Defense Authorization Act on May 6th. Abortion rights supporters criticized the vote for the risk to health that it poses for military women serving their country overseas. |
ACTION NEEDED |
Thank Rep. Harman and other committee members for their
votes to support the Harman amendment: Reyes (D-TX), Snyder (D-AR), Turner
(D-TX), Boyd (D-FL), A. Smith (D-WA), Sanchez (D-CA), Maloney (D-CT), Rodriguez
(D-TX), McKinney (D-GA), Sisisky (D-Va), Spratt (D-SC), Pickett (D-VA),
Evans (D-IL). Abercrombie (D-HI), Meehan (D-MA), Fowler (R-FL), McHale
(D-PA), Kennedy (D-RI) and Blagojevich (D-IL).
Give the members who voted against it a hard time: Bartlett (R-MD), Lewis (R-KY), Watts (R-OK), Thornberry (R-TX), Hostettler (R-IN), Chambliss (R-GA), Hilleary (R-TN), W. Jones (R-NC), McIntyre (D-NC), Ryun (R-KS), Pappas (R-NJ), Riley (R-AL), Redmond (R-MN), Granger (R-TX), Chair Spence (R-SC), Skelton (D-MO), Stump (R-AZ) Hunter (R-CA), Ortiz (D-TX), Weldon (R-PA), Taylor (D-MS), Hefley (R-CO), Saxton (R-NJ), Buyer (R-IN), Underwood (D-GU), McHugh (R-NY), Talent (R-MO) and Everett (R-AL). |
| Tobacco Tax/Child Care Funding Vote in Senate Soon | The Senate Commerce Committee recently passed the McCain tobacco
tax bill by a vote of 19-1 and it is expected to go to the floor during
the week of May 18th. Observers believe it will be a close vote with the
tobacco industry having stepped up a strong defensive public relations
and lobbying effort in recent weeks. Out of those tax revenues, if the
bill passes Congress, will come a $20 billion increase in funding for child
care, after-school programs and initiatives to reduce teen smoking.
Advocates have made the link between teen smoking and high quality child care and after- school programs. They note that quality early childhood programs have been shown to reduce criminal behavior which is correlated with risky behaviors such as smoking and using drugs. Other studies show that the nearly five million children who at home alone after school are much more likely to succumb to peer pressure or sophisticated marketing schemes and to engage in risky behaviors. After-school programs are also an important venue for providing anti-smoking information to young people and to model healthy life choices. Statistics show that every day 3,000 children start smoking and that more than three million teen-agers smoke. |
ACTION NEEDED |
From May 11th to June 12th, Working Assets, a long distance calling company, is sponsoring a free line to support this effort. Activists are advised to call 1-888-38 STAND UP (1-888-387-8263) to reach your U.S. Senator. Stress that we need quality affordable child care with after-school activities and that major new sources of revenue is absolutely necessary to finance this expansion of Child Care and Development Block Grant program. |